A - Masterful The RRD shows evidence of the following:
- thorough peer reading by multiple readers, both peer and
adult
-
extensive revision of diction as shown by numerous deletions, replacements, and
additions of words
-
extensive revision of sentences as shown by obvious re-combinations of
phrases and sentences
-
extensive revision of paragraphs and ideas as shown by movement and
reorganization throughout the paper
- various missteps in the process as shown by false-starts,
re-starts, abandoned ideas, etc . . .
- willingness to reconsider even satisfactory work to explore
possibilities and further improvement as shown by multiple versions of even
good work from different points of view or in different styles or in
different tones, etc.
- possible work in proofreading and editing as shown by
corrections in the paper
B - Developing The RRD shows evidence of the
following (may include some traits of Masterful):
- thorough peer reading by at least one peer reader
- adequate revision of diction as shown by some deletions,
replacements, and additions of words
- adequate revision of sentences as shown by some re-combinations of
phrases and sentences
- adequate revision of paragraphs and ideas as shown by a few
instances of movement and reorganization throughout the paper
- perhaps a few various missteps in the process as shown by
false-starts, re-starts, abandoned ideas, etc . . .
- willingness to revise even satisfactory work to explore
possibilities and further improvement as shown by multiple versions of even
good work from different points of view or in different styles or in
different tones, etc.
- possible work in proofreading and editing as shown by
corrections in the paper
C - Limited The RRD shows evidence of the following:
- adequate peer reading by one peer reader
- limited revision of diction as shown by only a few
deletions, replacements, and additions of words
- limited revision of sentences as shown by very few re-combinations of
phrases and sentences
- limited revision of paragraphs and ideas as shown by very
little movement and reorganization throughout the paper
- few or no missteps in the process as shown by false-starts,
re-starts, abandoned ideas, etc . . .
- a reluctance to revise even satisfactory work to explore
possibilities and further improvement as shown by multiple versions of even
good work from different points of view or in different styles or in
different tones, etc.
- possible work in proofreading and editing as shown by
corrections in the paper
D - Ineffective The RRD shows evidence of the following:
- no peer reading or inadequate peer reading
- limited revision of diction as shown by only a few
deletions, replacements, and additions of words - paper may only be
revised on this level
- little if any revision of sentences as shown by no or only
a couple re-combinations of
phrases and sentences
- no revision of paragraphs and ideas as shown by no changes
in structure or content
- few or no missteps in the process as shown by false-starts,
re-starts, abandoned ideas, etc . . .
- an unwillingness to revise even satisfactory work to
explore possibilities and further improvement as shown by multiple versions
of even good work from different points of view or in different styles or in
different tones, etc.
- possible work in proofreading and editing as shown by
corrections in the paper